Chapter 5: The Somatic Suppression
The elimination of body-based consciousness practices
The most intimate consciousness technology ever developed requires no external tools, sacred sites, or psychoactive plants—it is the human body itself1. Our investigation reveals that pre-Christian cultures understood embodiment not as housing for consciousness but as consciousness technology itself, capable of accessing information, inducing altered states, and interfacing with non-human intelligence through systematic physical practices2. The Christian transformation’s systematic suppression of somatic consciousness technologies represents perhaps the most personal and devastating aspect of the cognitive binding, as it severed humans from their most fundamental tool for consciousness development3.
The body in pre-Christian consciousness was understood as what anthropologist Marcel Mauss calls a “technical instrument”—the first and most natural technology humans possess4. Through specific movements, postures, breathing patterns, and physical practices, practitioners could reliably access consciousness states that contemporary neuroscience is only beginning to validate5. The systematic demonization of the body during the Christian period eliminated not merely physical practices but entire dimensions of consciousness that can only be accessed through somatic experience6.
The doctrine of the body as sinful flesh requiring subjugation represents more than theological position—it constitutes what Michel Foucault identifies as “biopower” at its most fundamental level7. By making the body itself suspect, Christianity eliminated the possibility that individuals might access consciousness technologies through their own physical experience without institutional mediation8. The result was not spiritual elevation but what contemporary somatic therapists recognize as culture-wide dissociation from embodied awareness9.
The Dancing Ground as Temple#
Before churches enforced seated stillness, sacred dance was perhaps humanity’s most universal consciousness technology10. Archaeological evidence from Paleolithic cave sites through classical temples reveals that rhythmic movement in sacred contexts was central to pre-Christian spiritual practice across all cultures11. The dance was not performance or entertainment but precision consciousness technology that utilized what neuroscientist Antonio Damasio calls “the body-minded brain”—the integration of movement, emotion, and cognition into unified states of awareness12.
The Greek choreia—sacred circular dancing—employed specific patterns of movement that contemporary research shows can induce altered states through what sports psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi identifies as “flow states”13. The archaeological remains of dancing grounds at sites like Knossos and Delphi reveal carefully designed spaces with acoustic and spatial properties optimized for collective movement practices14. Participants report that extended dancing in these configurations produced consciousness states characterized by ego dissolution, temporal distortion, and what anthropologist Victor Turner calls “spontaneous communitas”15.
The Dionysian mysteries centered on what classicist E.R. Dodds calls “ritual madness”—systematically induced altered states achieved through exhaustive dancing16. Contemporary neuroscience reveals that prolonged rhythmic movement produces endorphin releases that exceed those achieved through any other natural activity17. The combination of physical exhaustion, rhythmic entrainment, and collective synchronization created neurological conditions that enabled access to what participants described as divine possession states18.
Celtic and Germanic traditions employed similar movement practices in their seasonal festivals and warrior training19. The Norse berserkergang—the frenzied warrior dance—was not uncontrolled rage but systematic somatic practice for accessing altered states useful in combat20. Archaeological evidence from warrior burial sites shows specialized spaces designed for these movement practices, suggesting sophisticated understanding of how specific physical movements could reliably induce desired consciousness states21.
The Christian elimination of sacred dance was systematic and deliberate22. The Council of Laodicea (364 CE) explicitly banned dancing in churches, while subsequent councils expanded prohibitions to include all forms of religious dance23. The replacement of movement with enforced stillness represents what dance therapist Gabrielle Roth calls “the freezing of the life force”—the systematic suppression of humanity’s most natural consciousness technology24.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. ↩︎
Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎
Seligman, Martin E.P. Learned Helplessness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. ↩︎
Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997. ↩︎
Eagleman, David. Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. New York: Pantheon, 2011. ↩︎
Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. ↩︎
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984. ↩︎
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge, 1966. ↩︎
van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. ↩︎
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. ↩︎
Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Consciousness Instinct. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018. ↩︎
Ramachandran, V.S. The Tell-Tale Brain. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011. ↩︎
Bloomer, Kent C., and Charles W. Moore. Body, Memory, and Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977. ↩︎
Churchland, Paul M. Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984. ↩︎
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. ↩︎
Damasio, Antonio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994. ↩︎
Kandel, Eric R. In Search of Memory. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. ↩︎
Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an Illusion. New York: W. W. Norton, 1961. ↩︎
Alexander, Christopher. A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. ↩︎
Newberg, Andrew, and Mark Robert Waldman. How God Changes Your Brain. New York: Ballantine Books, 2009. ↩︎
Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press, 1995. ↩︎
Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy. London: Oxford University Press, 1923. ↩︎
Pals, Daniel L. Seven Theories of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. ↩︎
Clark, Andy. Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ↩︎