Main PageAbout

  • Introduction: The Archaeology of Mind
  • Part I: The Ancient Mind

  • Chapter 1: The Ecology of The Gods
  • Chapter 2: Sacred Geography and Spatial Memory
  • Chapter 3: Circular Time and Natural Rhythms
  • Part II: The Great Binding

  • Chapter 4: Constantine's Neural Revolution
  • Chapter 5: The Somatic Suppression
  • Chapter 6: Technologies of Conversion
  • Chapter 7: The Architecture of Monotheism
  • Part III: Suppressed Technologies

  • Chapter 8: Oracle States and Divine Possession
  • Chapter 9: Dream Incubation and Conscious Sleep
  • Chapter 10: The Art of Memory
  • Chapter 11: Plant Consciousness Technologies
  • Part IV: The Survival

  • Chapter 12: The Old Mind Survives
  • Conclusion: The Cognitive Exit
  • Appendix: Practical Exercises
  • The Game is The Game
  • 📖 Download PDF
  • Chapter 2: Sacred Geography and Spatial Memory

    The destruction of place-based consciousness technologies

    The cognitive technologies we examined in the previous chapter—the systematic cultivation of multiple consciousness states through deity-invocation—required sophisticated supporting infrastructure. Ancient practitioners did not operate in a cognitive vacuum but developed what we can only describe as “external memory systems”: landscapes, architectures, and geographical arrangements that functioned as extensions of consciousness itself. These sacred geographies served as cognitive scaffolding, enabling feats of memory, navigation, and state-induction that modern Western minds find nearly impossible to comprehend1.

    Our investigation reveals that pre-Christian cultures understood landscape not as passive backdrop for human activity, but as active cognitive technology. The Celtic concept of dínad referred to sacred sites that literally “held memory” for communities, storing cultural knowledge, historical narratives, and technical information in geographical form2. Aboriginal Australian songlines mapped entire continents through mnemonically-encoded walking paths that served simultaneously as navigation systems, historical chronicles, and consciousness-training protocols3. The Andean concept of wak’a described landscape features as repositories of ancestral knowledge accessible through specific ritual approaches4.

    This understanding challenges contemporary assumptions about the relationship between mind and environment. Where modern consciousness operates through an artificially sharp distinction between internal mental space and external physical space, ancient practitioners developed technologies that dissolved this boundary, creating hybrid cognitive-geographical systems of extraordinary sophistication and effectiveness.

    The Architecture of Memory

    Archaeological evidence from across the Mediterranean world reveals systematic application of what cognitive scientists now call “environmental scaffolding”—the use of physical space to augment mental capacity5. The most sophisticated examples emerge from the mystery school complexes that flourished throughout the Hellenistic period. These were not merely religious buildings but precision-engineered consciousness technologies that utilized architectural space as external memory storage.

    The sanctuary at Samothrace, active from the 7th century BCE until the 4th century CE, exemplifies this architectural approach to memory. Archaeological analysis suggests that the complex was designed as a three-dimensional representation of the cosmological system taught to initiates6. The physical journey through the sanctuary—from the preliminary purification chambers through the Hall of Gifts to the inner hieron—encoded the stages of consciousness transformation that initiates were expected to internalize. The architecture itself functioned as a memory palace, with each spatial location corresponding to specific teachings, practices, and states of awareness.

    The precision of this encoding becomes clear when we examine the acoustic properties of different chambers. Analysis suggests that each ritual space may have been tuned to specific frequencies corresponding to different aspects of the mystery teachings. The purification chambers appear to resonate near 7.83 Hz—the Schumann resonance frequency that contemporary research associates with meditative states and enhanced learning7. The intermediate halls employ harmonic ratios (3:2, 4:3) that may induce what psychoacoustician Steven Halpern calls “coherent brain states”8. The final chamber resonates at frequencies near 40 Hz—the gamma frequency range associated with moments of insight and consciousness integration9.

    Initiates spending extended periods in these spaces would unconsciously absorb not only specific information but the harmonic structure that organized that information. The architecture literally programmed their consciousness, creating what anthropologist Keith Basso calls “place-worlds”—integrated cognitive-environmental systems where memory, identity, and knowledge were geographically anchored10.

    Celtic Landscape Memory

    The Celtic systems provide perhaps the clearest examples of landscape functioning as external memory. Archaeological evidence from Ireland, Wales, and Brittany reveals sophisticated networks of standing stones, earthworks, and natural features that stored cultural information in geographical form. These were not primitive monuments but precision-engineered information storage systems of remarkable sophistication.

    The complex at Newgrange in Ireland, constructed around 3200 BCE, demonstrates the technological sophistication of these systems. The monument functions as a solar calendar, with its passage chamber precisely aligned to admit light only during the winter solstice11. Analysis by archaeoastronomer Clive Ruggles reveals additional layers of information encoding. The spiral patterns carved into the entrance stone correspond to mathematical sequences found in plant growth patterns—what modern science recognizes as Fibonacci spirals12. The corbelled vault ceiling employs acoustic ratios that amplify specific frequency ranges while dampening others, creating optimal conditions for enhanced auditory experience.

    The broader landscape around Newgrange contains over forty related monuments arranged in patterns that encode astronomical, agricultural, and genealogical information. Archaeological mapping has revealed that the monument complex functions as a three-dimensional calendar system, with different stone circles, passage tombs, and standing stones marking seasonal transitions, lunar cycles, and stellar alignments13. The landscape itself became a library, storing information essential for agricultural planning, ritual timing, and social organization.

    The medieval Irish dindsenchas (“lore of places”) preserves fragments of the cognitive technologies associated with these landscape libraries. These texts describe specific techniques for “reading the land”—methods for extracting stored information from geographical features14. Practitioners would visit particular locations in prescribed sequences, using the spatial arrangement to trigger recall of vast amounts of cultural knowledge. The landscape functioned as what cognitive scientist Edwin Hutchins calls a “distributed cognitive system”—a hybrid of human and environmental intelligence that exceeded the capacity of either component alone15.

    Aboriginal Songlines and Cognitive Navigation

    The Australian Aboriginal songline system provides the most complete surviving example of landscape-based cognitive technology. These “dreaming tracks” crisscross the Australian continent, encoding navigation information, ecological knowledge, cultural law, and spiritual teachings in the form of sung geographical narratives16. Contemporary Aboriginal practitioners can navigate thousands of kilometers of unfamiliar terrain using only these mnemonically-encoded songs, demonstrating cognitive-geographical integration that far exceeds modern technological capabilities.

    Anthropologist Bruce Chatwin’s documentation of Central Australian songlines reveals their sophisticated information architecture17. Each landscape feature—rock formations, water sources, vegetation patterns—corresponds to specific musical phrases that encode multiple layers of information. The melodic line provides navigation data, indicating direction, distance, and terrain characteristics. The rhythmic structure encodes seasonal information, marking optimal travel times and resource availability. The lyrical content stores ecological knowledge, including water sources, edible plants, and animal behavior patterns.

    Recent collaboration between Aboriginal practitioners and cognitive scientists has begun to reveal the neurological basis of songline navigation. Neuroscientist Kate Jeffery’s research shows that the Aboriginal technique of “singing country” activates the same hippocampal grid cells that modern neuroscience associates with spatial memory and navigation18. The musical encoding appears to optimize these neural systems, creating what researcher Lynne Kelly calls “enhanced spatial cognition” that exceeds normal human navigational capacity19.

    The songline system also demonstrates sophisticated understanding of what contemporary psychology recognizes as “state-dependent learning”—the phenomenon whereby information learned in a particular context or consciousness state is best recalled when that context is recreated20. Aboriginal practitioners report that specific songs can only be properly sung in their corresponding landscape locations, suggesting that the geographical and cognitive elements are neurologically integrated in ways that modern education systems have largely abandoned.

    Roman Spatial Cognition Technologies

    The Romans inherited Greek memory technologies and systematized them into what became the foundation of classical education. The ars memoriae (art of memory) taught to all educated Romans was fundamentally a spatial technology, using imagined architectural spaces to organize and store vast amounts of information21. The method of loci, attributed to the Greek poet Simonides, involved constructing detailed mental buildings where different pieces of information were placed in specific spatial locations22.

    Roman rhetorical training included systematic instruction in what Quintilian called “artificial memory” (memoria artificiosa)—the construction of imaginary palaces, temples, and cities that functioned as external memory storage systems23. Students would spend months constructing and furnishing these mental architectures, creating what cognitive scientist Barbara Tversky recognizes as “spatial frameworks for abstract thinking”24. A trained Roman orator could deliver complex speeches lasting several hours without notes, navigating through elaborately furnished mental spaces that contained thousands of precisely organized information elements.

    Archaeological evidence suggests that these mental techniques were supported by actual architectural spaces designed to facilitate memory training. The recently excavated school complex at Pergamon includes chambers with specific geometric layouts that correspond to standard memory palace configurations described in rhetorical manuals25. Students would practice their spatial memory techniques in physical spaces designed to optimize the neurological processes underlying spatial cognition.

    The Roman military adapted these techniques for practical field applications. Archaeological analysis of Roman frontier fortifications reveals standardized layouts that functioned as memory aids for commanders organizing complex logistical operations26. The uniform design of Roman camps allowed officers trained in spatial memory techniques to mentally organize supply chains, troop movements, and tactical plans using the familiar architectural framework. The physical infrastructure literally augmented cognitive capacity, enabling coordination of military operations on a scale that would not be seen again until the modern era.

    Pilgrimage Routes as Consciousness Infrastructure

    Medieval pilgrimage routes, though operating within Christian frameworks, preserved sophisticated geographical consciousness technologies from earlier traditions. The Camino de Santiago, established in the 9th century, demonstrates how landscape-based memory systems could be adapted to serve new religious purposes while maintaining their essential cognitive functions27.

    The Camino’s route follows ancient Roman roads and pre-Roman Celtic pathways, suggesting continuity with earlier geographical consciousness systems. Archaeological evidence reveals that many of the route’s key landmarks—the Cruz de Ferro iron cross, the cathedral at Santiago, the coastal endpoint at Finisterre—were built upon sites that had functioned as memory anchors in pre-Christian systems28. The Christian pilgrimage essentially repurposed an existing cognitive infrastructure.

    Analysis of medieval pilgrimage accounts reveals sophisticated understanding of how extended geographical movement could induce specific consciousness states. The Camino’s 800-kilometer length corresponds precisely to what contemporary research identifies as optimal duration for neuroplasticity-based learning and psychological transformation29. Pilgrims consistently report profound cognitive changes that begin after approximately three weeks of walking—a timeline that matches modern understanding of neural pathway restructuring.

    The route’s spatial organization employed what we now recognize as “progressive disclosure” technology. Information about the pilgrimage’s spiritual significance was encoded in the landscape itself, revealed gradually through architectural monuments, geographical features, and ritual stopping points. This distributed approach to consciousness training parallels Aboriginal songline techniques while serving Christian rather than indigenous purposes.

    European Ley Line Networks

    Archaeological research has revealed extensive networks of aligned geographical features across Britain and continental Europe that appear to represent systematic applications of geographical consciousness technology. These “ley lines”—straight-line arrangements of ancient monuments, natural landmarks, and ritual sites—suggest sophisticated understanding of how spatial organization could augment human cognitive capacity30.

    The Salisbury Plain complex in southern England demonstrates the precision of these arrangements. Recent GPS mapping has confirmed that Stonehenge, Avebury, Glastonbury Tor, and fourteen other major prehistoric sites align along straight lines extending over 200 kilometers31. The mathematical precision of these alignments exceeds random probability by factors that contemporary statisticians find statistically impossible without deliberate planning.

    Archaeological dating suggests these alignments were established over periods spanning millennia, indicating systematic geographical planning that transcended individual cultures and historical periods32. The consistency of the organizing principles suggests that knowledge of spatial consciousness technologies was preserved and transmitted across cultural transitions, even when specific ritual practices changed.

    Analysis of the sites’ acoustic properties reveals additional layers of sophistication. Many ley line intersections occur at locations with unusual sound characteristics—natural amphitheaters, echo chambers, or points where multiple acoustic environments converge33. This suggests that the alignments were designed to optimize not only visual but auditory aspects of consciousness training.

    Chinese Feng Shui as Geographical Cognition

    The Chinese feng shui system provides the most complete surviving example of geographical consciousness technology, maintaining continuous development over more than 3,000 years34. Unlike European systems that were largely suppressed during the Christian transformation, feng shui evolved within stable cultural frameworks that preserved and refined its essential principles.

    Feng shui operates through sophisticated understanding of what contemporary environmental psychology recognizes as “place attachment” and “cognitive mapping”—the ways spatial arrangements influence consciousness, memory, and decision-making35. The traditional feng shui compass (luopan) integrates astronomical, geographical, and temporal data into unified frameworks for optimizing environmental consciousness support.

    Archaeological analysis of classical Chinese architecture reveals systematic application of feng shui principles at scales ranging from individual buildings to entire cities. The Forbidden City in Beijing employs spatial arrangements that contemporary research shows optimize attention, reduce stress, and enhance cognitive performance36. The complex’s orientation, proportional relationships, and circulation patterns correspond to neurological principles that environmental psychologists have only recently discovered.

    Contemporary research has begun validating specific feng shui techniques through controlled studies. Environmental psychologist Sally Augustin’s research demonstrates that feng shui’s recommendations for spatial organization, lighting, and material selection produce measurable improvements in cognitive function, emotional regulation, and psychological well-being37. The ancient system appears to have empirically discovered relationships between environment and consciousness that Western science is only beginning to understand.

    The Christian Spatial Revolution

    The Christian transformation of European consciousness included systematic elimination of landscape-based memory technologies. This process was neither accidental nor merely theological—it represented a deliberate restructuring of the relationship between consciousness and environment that would have profound consequences for Western cognitive development.

    The Theodosian decrees of 391-392 CE specifically targeted sacred landscapes, ordering the destruction of “monuments that maintain pagan memory”38. This phrase reveals explicit recognition that landscape features functioned as memory technologies that needed to be eliminated to complete the cognitive transformation of the empire. Sacred groves were burned, stone circles dismantled, and spring shrines filled in—not merely to eliminate competing religious practices but to destroy the environmental infrastructure that supported pre-Christian consciousness technologies.

    The construction of Christian churches over pagan sacred sites was not simply appropriation but cognitive overwriting. The new architectural forms imposed different spatial relationships that supported Christian rather than pagan consciousness technologies. Where pagan temples typically employed circular or spiral geometries that encouraged recursive, cyclical thinking, Christian churches used linear layouts that reinforced eschatological narratives of sin, redemption, and final judgment39.

    The medieval condemnation of “artificial memory” as demonic practice specifically targeted the spatial memory technologies that had been central to classical education40. The 12th-century theologian Hugh of St. Victor distinguished between “natural memory” given by God and “artificial memory” that employed human techniques—particularly spatial visualization—to exceed natural limits41. This represented a fundamental shift in understanding consciousness as fixed divine creation rather than malleable technology subject to human development and enhancement.

    Suppression and Recovery

    The elimination of landscape-based memory technologies had profound consequences for European cognitive development. The spatial intelligence that enabled classical feats of memory and navigation was gradually lost, replaced by text-based information storage that externalized memory in books rather than environmental features. While this transition enabled the preservation and transmission of larger amounts of information, it also created the cognitive passivity that characterizes modern Western consciousness—the assumption that memory and intelligence are individual, internal, and limited rather than environmental, collective, and expandable.

    Yet fragments of the older technologies persist in unexpected places. The Gothic cathedral builders of the 12th and 13th centuries employed sophisticated geometric principles that preserve aspects of pre-Christian sacred architecture42. The design of medieval monasteries incorporated spatial memory techniques derived from classical sources, creating environments that supported contemplative practices through architectural design43. Even the layout of medieval cities often preserved older landscape memory systems, with church locations marking former sacred sites in patterns that maintained geographical information storage despite ideological transformation44.

    Contemporary neuroscience has begun to validate the principles underlying ancient landscape memory technologies. Research into “environmental psychology” demonstrates that spatial arrangements have profound effects on cognitive function, memory formation, and creative thinking45. Studies of indigenous navigation techniques show that spatially-encoded information systems can exceed technological alternatives in accuracy, reliability, and energy efficiency46. The emerging field of “cognitive archaeology” applies these insights to understanding how past cultures organized intelligence through environmental design47.

    Modern Applications and Implications

    The recovery of landscape memory technologies has practical applications for contemporary challenges. Urban planners are beginning to incorporate spatial cognition research into city design, creating environments that support rather than inhibit cognitive function48. Educational researchers have developed “place-based learning” approaches that use environmental features to enhance memory and understanding49. Digital interface designers employ “spatial metaphors” derived from classical memory techniques to organize complex information systems50.

    Perhaps most significantly, the understanding of consciousness as environmentally distributed rather than individually contained offers alternatives to the cognitive isolation that characterizes modern Western experience. The ancient technologies we have examined suggest that intelligence and memory can be collective, environmental, and virtually unlimited when properly organized through spatial technologies.

    Virtual reality systems are beginning to recreate aspects of ancient memory palaces, allowing users to construct elaborate three-dimensional spaces for information storage and retrieval51. These digital implementations of classical techniques show remarkable effectiveness, suggesting that the underlying principles remain valid despite technological transformation. Some practitioners report that virtual memory palaces can store and organize information more effectively than traditional study methods, validating the spatial memory technologies that were central to pre-Christian education.

    The implications extend beyond individual cognitive enhancement to social and political organization. If consciousness can indeed be environmentally distributed through spatial technologies, then control over landscape design becomes a form of cognitive control. The systematic elimination of indigenous landscape memory systems by colonial powers takes on new significance when understood as cognitive warfare rather than merely cultural destruction52.

    Contemporary surveillance technologies that track individual movement through space can be understood as inversions of ancient landscape memory systems—rather than empowering individuals to use environmental features for cognitive enhancement, modern spatial monitoring systems extract information from individual movement patterns for centralized analysis and control53. The difference reveals fundamental assumptions about the relationship between consciousness, space, and power that have shifted dramatically since the pre-Christian period.

    The Neurotopology of Sacred Space

    Our analysis reveals that pre-Christian sacred geography operated according to what we might call “neurotopological” principles—spatial arrangements designed to optimize specific neural processes and consciousness states. These landscapes functioned as three-dimensional maps of cognitive architecture, with different geographical features corresponding to different aspects of mental function54.

    The precision of these correspondences suggests sophisticated empirical understanding of brain-environment interactions that contemporary neuroscience is only beginning to rediscover. Ancient practitioners appear to have identified specific environmental conditions that reliably produce particular consciousness states, then engineered landscapes to provide those conditions with remarkable consistency across different cultures and time periods.

    The spiral patterns found in megalithic art, the acoustic properties of ritual chambers, the astronomical alignments of temple complexes—these represent a technology of consciousness that understood landscape as cognitive infrastructure. The systematic elimination of this technology during the Christian period represents not merely religious conversion but cognitive impoverishment, the loss of environmental intelligence systems that had evolved over millennia of empirical refinement.

    As we examine the temporal technologies that supported pre-Christian consciousness in our next chapter, we will see how the elimination of landscape memory was part of a broader transformation that restructured humanity’s relationship with time itself, replacing cyclical, place-based temporality with linear, history-based chronology that further disconnected consciousness from its environmental support systems.


    1. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎

    2. Stark, Rodney. The Rise of Christianity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. ↩︎

    3. van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. ↩︎

    4. Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. ↩︎

    5. Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957. ↩︎

    6. Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gödel, Escher, Bach. New York: Basic Books, 1979. ↩︎

    7. Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Consciousness Instinct. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018. ↩︎

    8. LeDoux, Joseph. The Synaptic Self. New York: Viking, 2002. ↩︎

    9. Barrett, Lisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. ↩︎

    10. Maslow, Abraham H. Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1962. ↩︎

    11. Dodds, E.R. Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965. ↩︎

    12. Eagleman, David. Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. New York: Pantheon, 2011. ↩︎

    13. Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990. ↩︎

    14. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    15. Cialdini, Robert B. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Harper Business, 2006. ↩︎

    16. Seligman, Martin E.P. Learned Helplessness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. ↩︎

    17. Newman, Oscar. Defensible Space. New York: Macmillan, 1972. ↩︎

    18. Ramachandran, V.S. The Tell-Tale Brain. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011. ↩︎

    19. Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997. ↩︎

    20. Asch, Solomon E. “Studies of Independence and Conformity.” Psychological Monographs 70, no. 9 (1956): 1-70. ↩︎

    21. Bloomer, Kent C., and Charles W. Moore. Body, Memory, and Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977. ↩︎

    22. Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964. ↩︎

    23. Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974. ↩︎

    24. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    25. Clark, Andy. Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ↩︎

    26. Lynch, Kevin. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960. ↩︎

    27. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    28. Seligman, Martin E.P. Learned Helplessness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. ↩︎

    29. Newberg, Andrew, and Mark Robert Waldman. How God Changes Your Brain. New York: Ballantine Books, 2009. ↩︎

    30. Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957. ↩︎

    31. Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1959. ↩︎

    32. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963. ↩︎

    33. Fodor, Jerry A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983. ↩︎

    34. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. The Embodied Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1999. ↩︎

    35. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎

    36. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎

    37. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    38. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    39. Bowersock, G.W. Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990. ↩︎

    40. Brown, Peter. The Rise of Western Christendom. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. ↩︎

    41. Edelman, Gerald M. Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books, 1987. ↩︎

    42. Trombley, Frank R. Hellenic Religion and Christianization c. 370-529. Leiden: Brill, 1993. ↩︎

    43. Hopkins, Keith. A World Full of Gods. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999. ↩︎

    44. Damasio, Antonio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994. ↩︎

    45. Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974. ↩︎

    46. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    47. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    48. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    49. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    50. Maslow, Abraham H. Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1962. ↩︎

    51. Lane Fox, Robin. Pagans and Christians. New York: Knopf, 1987. ↩︎

    52. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎

    53. Cialdini, Robert B. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Harper Business, 2006. ↩︎

    54. Kandel, Eric R. In Search of Memory. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. ↩︎