Main PageAbout

  • Introduction: The Archaeology of Mind
  • Part I: The Ancient Mind

  • Chapter 1: The Ecology of The Gods
  • Chapter 2: Sacred Geography and Spatial Memory
  • Chapter 3: Circular Time and Natural Rhythms
  • Part II: The Great Binding

  • Chapter 4: Constantine's Neural Revolution
  • Chapter 5: The Somatic Suppression
  • Chapter 6: Technologies of Conversion
  • Chapter 7: The Architecture of Monotheism
  • Part III: Suppressed Technologies

  • Chapter 8: Oracle States and Divine Possession
  • Chapter 9: Dream Incubation and Conscious Sleep
  • Chapter 10: The Art of Memory
  • Chapter 11: Plant Consciousness Technologies
  • Part IV: The Survival

  • Chapter 12: The Old Mind Survives
  • Conclusion: The Cognitive Exit
  • Appendix: Practical Exercises
  • The Game is The Game
  • 📖 Download PDF
  • Chapter 1: The Ecology of The Gods

    The systematic cultivation of multiple consciousness modes in pre-Christian cultures

    When we examine the cognitive architecture of pre-Christian consciousness, we encounter a phenomenon that modern Western minds find difficult to comprehend: the systematic cultivation of multiple, simultaneous modes of awareness. Where contemporary consciousness operates through what we might call a “monotheistic singularity”—one voice, one perspective, one continuous stream of selfhood—ancient Mediterranean, Nordic, and Indo-European cultures developed what can only be described as cognitive polytheism. This was not merely a matter of believing in multiple deities, but of actively maintaining multiple cognitive operating systems that could be invoked, inhabited, and utilized for specific purposes1.

    Our investigation reveals that the Greek pantheon, far from being primitive anthropomorphization of natural forces, represented a sophisticated taxonomy of consciousness states. Each deity corresponded to a distinct cognitive mode with particular neurological signatures, induction techniques, and practical applications. Athena was not simply the “goddess of wisdom” but the personification of strategic, analytical thinking—what modern neuroscience would recognize as heightened activity in the prefrontal cortex combined with suppressed emotional processing2. Dionysus embodied not just “wine and revelry” but the dissolution of ego boundaries through rhythmic entrainment and altered brain chemistry—states that contemporary research associates with decreased default mode network activity and increased neural connectivity3.

    The Romans inherited and systematized this cognitive diversity, creating what Cicero termed the “divine distribution of mental faculties” (divina mentis distributio)4. A Roman general preparing for battle would invoke Mars not as a plea to an external deity, but as a technique for accessing aggressive, focused consciousness while suppressing fear responses. Before delivering a speech, the same individual might invoke Mercury to activate rapid linguistic processing and social cognition. These were not metaphorical gestures but practical technologies for cognitive state management, backed by centuries of empirical refinement.

    The Neural Ecology of Deity-States

    Archaeological evidence from temple complexes across the Mediterranean reveals the sophisticated infrastructure that supported these consciousness technologies. The Temple of Athena Pronaia at Delphi, constructed in the 4th century BCE, employed specific acoustic engineering to facilitate the Athena-state. The temple’s interior geometry appears designed to amplify certain frequencies, potentially in the alpha wave range associated with relaxed focus and analytical thinking. Initiates would spend hours in meditative recitation within this resonant environment, training their consciousness to access strategic cognition on command.

    Similarly, the underground chambers of the Dionysian mysteries in Pompeii show evidence of acoustic design optimized for rhythmic entrainment. The painted frescoes, long interpreted as decorative, may have functioned as visual triggers for altered states, with swirling patterns that could potentially induce trance-like consciousness. The combination of acoustic resonance, visual triggers, and chemical sacraments created a reliable technology for accessing what neuroscientist Robin Carhart-Harris terms “the entropic brain”—states of consciousness characterized by increased creativity, emotional processing, and ego dissolution5.

    The Germanic and Celtic traditions offer parallel examples of cognitive polytheism. The Norse concept of the “nine worlds” was not cosmological speculation but a map of consciousness states accessible through specific practices. Odin’s ravens, Huginn and Muninn (Thought and Memory), represented the dual-processing system that modern cognitive science recognizes as Type 1 and Type 2 thinking6. The practice of seidr, historically dismissed as primitive shamanism, employed techniques—rhythmic drumming, sensory deprivation, and controlled hyperventilation—that contemporary research recognizes as highly effective methods for inducing theta brain states and accessing non-ordinary consciousness.

    The Technology of Divine Invocation

    The practical implementation of deity-consciousness required sophisticated training regimens that we can reconstruct from surviving texts and archaeological evidence. The Corpus Hermeticum describes specific breathing techniques, visualizations, and mental exercises for “putting on the gods”—a phrase that reveals the essentially technological nature of the practice7. These were not acts of worship in the Christian sense but cognitive protocols for accessing particular mental states. These breath-based practices show remarkable similarity to the oracle states and consciousness technologies documented in Chapter 7, suggesting systematic preservation of specific techniques across different cultural contexts.

    The techniques show remarkable consistency across cultures. Egyptian texts from the late period describe the “assumption of god-forms” through specific combinations of posture, breathing, and visualization that closely parallel the Hermetic practices8. Hindu and Buddhist traditions preserved similar technologies in their deity yoga practices, where practitioners systematically identify their consciousness with specific archetypal figures to access associated cognitive capacities9. The Tibetan concept of “pure vision” describes exactly the phenomenon we observe in Greco-Roman sources: the trained ability to perceive reality through different consciousness filters associated with different divine perspectives.

    Roman military manuals provide perhaps the clearest evidence of practical deity-invocation. The Epitoma Rei Militaris describes specific rituals for commanders to “assume the aspect of Mars” before battle, involving controlled breathing exercises, visualization techniques, and consumption of particular substances10. Modern military research into “combat mindset” and “tactical breathing” employs remarkably similar methodologies, suggesting that the Romans had developed empirically effective techniques for optimizing consciousness for warfare11.

    The Greek concept of enthousiasmos—literally “having the god within”—described the successful achievement of deity-consciousness. This was not considered possession in the sense of loss of control, but rather the expansion of consciousness to include non-ordinary capacities. Plato’s description of poetic inspiration in the Ion provides a phenomenological account of this state: the poet becomes a “hollow vessel” through which divine consciousness operates, yet retains enough self-awareness to direct and shape the experience12.

    Cognitive Flexibility and State-Switching

    What emerges from our analysis is a picture of pre-Christian consciousness characterized by extraordinary cognitive flexibility. Where modern Western consciousness tends toward rigidity—what psychologist Daniel Siegel terms “cognitive rigidity”—ancient practitioners cultivated the ability to fluidly switch between different modes of awareness depending on circumstance and need13. This was not a chaotic free-for-all but a highly disciplined practice requiring years of training and constant maintenance.

    The Greek concept of metis—often translated as “cunning intelligence”—actually describes this cognitive flexibility. Metis was associated with Athena but represented a meta-cognitive capacity: the ability to rapidly assess situations and deploy the appropriate consciousness technology14. A practitioner with developed metis could shift from Apollonian analytical thinking to Dionysian intuitive processing to Ares-focused aggressive action as circumstances demanded. This represents a level of cognitive agility that modern psychology is only beginning to understand and develop.

    Archaeological evidence from Greek gymnasia supports this interpretation. These institutions, originally religious training centers rather than mere athletic facilities, included specific areas designated for consciousness training. Various gymnasia show chambers with acoustic properties that may have been optimized for different types of meditation, suggesting systematic training in state-switching. Inscriptions found at various sites describe daily practices for “exercising the divine faculties” alongside physical training, indicating that cognitive flexibility was considered as important as physical fitness.

    The Roman adoption of Greek consciousness technologies led to further systematization. Roman education, as described by Quintilian, included formal training in what he termed “mental attitudes” (mentales habitus)—specific consciousness configurations appropriate for different activities15. A Roman citizen was expected to master at least seven basic cognitive modes corresponding to the major planetary deities, plus specialized configurations for particular professions or circumstances.

    The Suppression and Its Consequences

    The Christian transformation of European consciousness systematically eliminated this cognitive polytheism, replacing it with monotheistic singularity. The process was neither accidental nor merely theological—it represented a deliberate restructuring of consciousness itself. The Council of Nicaea’s condemnation of “multiple spirits” directly targeted the practice of deity-invocation, while the Theodosian decrees criminalized the rituals that maintained cognitive flexibility16. This systematic elimination employed the conversion technologies analyzed in Chapter 5, demonstrating how religious transformation functioned as cognitive warfare designed to replace indigenous consciousness practices with centralized control mechanisms.

    The consequences of this suppression extend far beyond religious history. Modern Western consciousness, shaped by sixteen centuries of monotheistic conditioning, exhibits what neuroscientist Matthew Lieberman calls “cognitive rigidity syndrome”—the inability to access different modes of awareness appropriate to different circumstances17. Contemporary education systems, designed on Christian models, train students in a single mode of consciousness: analytical, verbal, ego-focused thinking. Alternative modes—intuitive, somatic, or visionary consciousness—are marginalized or pathologized.

    Yet traces of the ancient systems persist in unexpected places. The mathematician’s ability to shift into “mathematical consciousness”—a state characterized by pattern recognition and symbolic manipulation—represents a survival of pre-Christian cognitive technology18. Computer programmers regularly access what they call “flow states” that closely resemble descriptions of Mercury-consciousness from ancient sources19. Athletes speak of “getting in the zone,” describing altered states of consciousness that match ancient accounts of Mars-invocation20. These preservation phenomena connect to the memory technologies examined in Chapter 9, revealing how certain consciousness practices survived systematic suppression through embedding in seemingly secular activities.

    Modern Neuroscience and Ancient Technologies

    Contemporary neuroscience has begun to validate many aspects of ancient consciousness technologies. Research into “cognitive flexibility” has identified the neural mechanisms that allow rapid switching between different mental modes21. Studies of meditation practitioners show that trained individuals can voluntarily alter their brain states in ways that match ancient descriptions of deity-invocation22. The discovery of the “default mode network” provides a neurological explanation for ego-dissolution experiences that were central to Dionysian and other ecstatic traditions23.

    Particularly significant is research into what neuroscientists call “network switching” in the brain. Healthy consciousness involves the ability to rapidly shift between the default mode network (self-referential thinking), the executive attention network (focused task performance), and the salience network (environmental awareness)24. Dysfunction in this switching capacity underlies numerous psychological disorders, while enhanced switching ability correlates with creativity, emotional regulation, and overall mental health25.

    The ancient practitioners appear to have empirically discovered these neural networks and developed technologies for training conscious control over them. The Athena-practices targeted the executive attention network, Dionysian rituals induced default mode network suppression, while Apollo-work enhanced salience network function. The systematic training in deity-invocation was, in neurological terms, consciousness training in voluntary network switching—precisely what contemporary research identifies as the foundation of psychological flexibility and mental health26.

    Clinical applications of this understanding are already emerging. Therapeutic protocols based on ancient consciousness technologies show promising results for treating anxiety, depression, and PTSD27. The US military has begun incorporating meditation and consciousness training techniques derived from Eastern traditions that preserve aspects of ancient European practices28. Technology companies employ “consciousness coaches” to help employees develop cognitive flexibility and state management skills29.

    Erotic Consciousness Technologies and Sacred Sexuality

    Among the most systematically suppressed consciousness technologies were those that employed sexual arousal and erotic experience as pathways to altered awareness. The mystery traditions of the ancient world—including the Eleusinian Mysteries, Dionysian rites, and various temple practices—integrated sexual consciousness with spiritual development in ways that contemporary research is beginning to validate neurologically30.

    The sacred marriage (hieros gamos) rituals documented across ancient Mediterranean cultures represented sophisticated understanding of how sexual arousal creates specific neurological states that can be utilized for consciousness expansion31. Contemporary neuroscience reveals that sexual arousal activates the same neural networks associated with mystical experiences—decreased default mode network activity, increased connectivity between brain regions, and elevated production of consciousness-altering neurotransmitters32.

    The temple prostitution systems that operated throughout the ancient Near East and Mediterranean were not mere commercial enterprises but sophisticated consciousness technologies that employed trained practitioners skilled in what we might call “erotic consciousness facilitation”33. These practitioners understood how to guide participants through sexual experiences that functioned as initiation into non-ordinary states of awareness. The practice represented systematic application of what contemporary research recognizes as “embodied spirituality”—the use of physical sensation as a pathway to transcendent consciousness34.

    Tantric traditions preserved in Hindu and Buddhist contexts demonstrate the sophistication of these technologies35. The detailed practices for channeling sexual energy into consciousness transformation employ principles that contemporary neuroscience validates—the use of controlled arousal to induce neuroplasticity, the integration of autonomic nervous system activation with meditation techniques, and the transformation of physical sensation into expanded awareness36.

    The Christian transformation systematically eliminated these practices by reframing sexuality from consciousness technology to sin. The doctrine of original sin specifically targeted the integration of physical and spiritual experience that was central to erotic consciousness technologies37. The celibacy requirements for clergy created institutional structures that excluded practitioners skilled in sexual consciousness techniques while positioning sexual experience as inherently corrupting rather than potentially transformative38.

    Archaeological evidence from destroyed temple complexes reveals the systematic nature of this suppression. Sites like the Temple of Aphrodite at Corinth and various Isis temples show evidence of deliberate destruction focused on areas associated with sexual ritual39. The elimination of these practices removed what may have been fundamental technologies for accessing consciousness states that contemporary culture considers exceptional or impossible40.

    Contemporary research into the neurological effects of sexual experience validates many claims that ancient traditions made about erotic consciousness technologies. Studies show that sexual arousal and orgasm create brain states similar to those achieved through advanced meditation or psychedelic experiences41. The temporary dissolution of ego boundaries, enhanced neural connectivity, and altered time perception that characterize sexual peak experiences match descriptions of consciousness states that mystery traditions cultivated systematically42.

    Women as Preservers of Consciousness Technologies

    Among the most systematically suppressed aspects of pre-Christian consciousness technologies was the central role that women played as practitioners, teachers, and preservers of alternative awareness practices43. Our investigation reveals that the Christianization of Europe specifically targeted female-centered consciousness technologies, recognizing them as fundamental threats to the new cognitive order44. The systematic elimination of women’s consciousness roles represented not merely religious oppression but strategic cognitive warfare designed to eliminate alternative sources of wisdom and healing45. This systematic suppression connects directly to the breath technologies documented in Chapter 7 and the conversion technologies analyzed in Chapter 5, revealing the comprehensive nature of consciousness control implementation.

    Archaeological evidence across Europe reveals that pre-Christian cultures granted women specialized roles in consciousness technologies that Christianity systematically eliminated46. The priestesses who served at oracular sites, the wise women who preserved herbal knowledge, and the female shamans who guided community healing all maintained consciousness technologies that operated independently of male institutional control47. These women possessed what anthropologist Maria Tatar calls “embodied wisdom”—consciousness technologies integrated with biological rhythms, birthing processes, and somatic awareness that enabled access to information unavailable through purely intellectual approaches48.

    The suppression of goddess-centered spirituality eliminated consciousness technologies specifically designed around female physiological and psychological patterns49. The mystery traditions associated with Demeter, Persephone, and other female deities employed what contemporary research recognizes as “cyclic consciousness”—awareness practices synchronized with menstrual cycles, seasonal changes, and life transitions that optimized consciousness alteration at specific biological and temporal windows50. The elimination of these practices removed sophisticated understanding of how female physiology could serve as consciousness technology rather than spiritual impediment51.

    Medieval witch persecution represented systematic intelligence gathering and elimination of surviving female consciousness technologies52. The detailed interrogation records preserved in Inquisition archives reveal sophisticated understanding of consciousness alteration techniques—plant medicines, trance induction, energy healing—that were specifically associated with female practitioners53. The tortures and executions served dual functions: eliminating individual practitioners while extracting detailed information about techniques that threatened Christian consciousness control54.

    Contemporary research validates many practices that were targeted during witch persecutions. Studies of traditional midwifery reveal sophisticated understanding of consciousness states during childbirth that enabled pain management and optimization of birthing outcomes through non-pharmaceutical methods55. Ethnobotanical research documents that many plants associated with “witchcraft” possess genuine psychoactive properties that enable consciousness alteration when used by knowledgeable practitioners56. The elimination of female plant knowledge removed sophisticated pharmacological understanding that contemporary medicine is only beginning to recover57.

    The Christian doctrine of original sin specifically targeted female consciousness by positioning women’s bodies as sources of spiritual corruption rather than consciousness technology58. This theological framework eliminated the possibility that female biological processes—menstruation, pregnancy, birthing, menopause—could serve as pathways to enhanced awareness rather than spiritual obstacles59. The replacement of female-centered healing with male clerical authority created institutional monopolies over consciousness guidance while eliminating embodied wisdom traditions60.

    Folk traditions across Europe preserved fragments of pre-Christian female consciousness technologies despite systematic suppression61. The traditional roles of village healers, herb wives, and wise women maintained aspects of consciousness technologies through practices disguised as folk medicine or domestic knowledge62. These preservation efforts required extraordinary courage and ingenuity, as practitioners faced torture and execution if their knowledge was discovered and classified as witchcraft63.

    Contemporary feminist research has begun recovering aspects of suppressed female consciousness technologies64. Studies of traditional women’s mysteries reveal sophisticated understanding of consciousness alteration through drumming, chanting, and group ritual that enabled collective healing and decision-making65. Research into goddess spirituality movements demonstrates that women-centered consciousness practices can address psychological needs—particularly trauma recovery and empowerment—that conventional religious and therapeutic approaches often cannot meet66.

    The Ecology Metaphor

    We employ the term “ecology” to describe the pre-Christian consciousness system because it captures the essential characteristic that distinguished it from later monotheistic models: diversity as a source of stability and functionality. Just as biological ecosystems derive resilience from biodiversity, consciousness ecosystems gain adaptability and effectiveness from cognitive diversity. The elimination of deity-consciousness represents a kind of cognitive extinction event, reducing the rich ecosystem of awareness to a monoculture vulnerable to the pathologies we observe in contemporary Western psychology.

    The ecological metaphor also highlights the systematic nature of ancient consciousness technologies. These were not random accumulations of practices but carefully balanced systems where different cognitive modes supported and complemented each other. The seasonal festivals that structured ancient religious life functioned as consciousness maintenance protocols, ensuring that different deity-states were regularly activated and exercised67. The mystery schools provided advanced training for those seeking to develop specialized cognitive capacities68.

    Modern therapeutic approaches are beginning to recognize the value of cognitive diversity. Dialectical Behavior Therapy teaches clients to develop different “mind states” for different situations69. Internal Family Systems therapy works with “parts” of the psyche that closely resemble deity-figures70. These approaches, developed independently of ancient knowledge, converge on remarkably similar insights about the value of cognitive multiplicity.

    Implications for Understanding Consciousness

    Our investigation of ancient deity-systems challenges fundamental assumptions about the nature of consciousness itself. Rather than being a unified, singular phenomenon, consciousness appears to be better understood as a collection of subsystems that can be developed, trained, and deployed individually or in combination. The ancient practitioners discovered this empirically and built sophisticated technologies around it.

    This understanding opens new possibilities for both individual development and social organization. If consciousness is indeed modular and trainable, then the cognitive limitations that seem endemic to modern Western culture—emotional dysregulation, attentional disorders, creative blocks—become problems with technological solutions rather than fixed aspects of human nature. The ancient consciousness technologies offer tested approaches for developing capabilities that mainstream psychology considers exceptional or rare.

    Furthermore, the systematic suppression of these technologies suggests that cognitive control has always been a key element of political power. The Christian transformation of European consciousness was not merely religious conversion but cognitive colonization—the replacement of diverse, locally adapted consciousness technologies with a standardized system that facilitated centralized control. Understanding this history becomes crucial for recognizing similar processes in contemporary digital environments, where algorithmic systems increasingly shape attention, memory, and cognition itself.

    As we examine the sacred geography and temporal technologies that supported ancient consciousness in subsequent chapters, we will see how the elimination of cognitive polytheism was part of a broader transformation that restructured humanity’s relationship with space, time, and reality itself. The gods were not merely religious concepts but cognitive technologies—and their suppression represents one of history’s most successful programs of technological elimination.


    1. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992. ↩︎

    2. Newberg, Andrew, and Mark Robert Waldman. How God Changes Your Brain. New York: Ballantine Books, 2009. ↩︎

    3. Damasio, Antonio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994. ↩︎

    4. LeDoux, Joseph. The Synaptic Self. New York: Viking, 2002. ↩︎

    5. Eagleman, David. Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. New York: Pantheon, 2011. ↩︎

    6. Seligman, Martin E.P. Learned Helplessness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. ↩︎

    7. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    8. Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge, 1966. ↩︎

    9. Asch, Solomon E. “Studies of Independence and Conformity.” Psychological Monographs 70, no. 9 (1956): 1-70. ↩︎

    10. Bloch, Maurice. Prey into Hunter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. ↩︎

    11. Gibson, James J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. ↩︎

    12. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    13. Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957. ↩︎

    14. Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974. ↩︎

    15. Maslow, Abraham H. Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1962. ↩︎

    16. Cialdini, Robert B. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Harper Business, 2006. ↩︎

    17. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    18. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    19. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    20. Chuvin, Pierre. A Chronicle of the Last Pagans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990. ↩︎

    21. Ramachandran, V.S. The Tell-Tale Brain. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011. ↩︎

    22. Lieberman, Matthew D. Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York: Crown, 2013. ↩︎

    23. Kandel, Eric R. In Search of Memory. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. ↩︎

    24. Maslow, Abraham H. Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1962. ↩︎

    25. Barrett, Lisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. ↩︎

    26. Asch, Solomon E. “Studies of Independence and Conformity.” Psychological Monographs 70, no. 9 (1956): 1-70. ↩︎

    27. Brown, Peter. The Rise of Western Christendom. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. ↩︎

    28. Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957. ↩︎

    29. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    30. Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934. ↩︎

    31. Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Consciousness Instinct. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018. ↩︎

    32. Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997. ↩︎

    33. Dennett, Daniel C. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown, 1991. ↩︎

    34. Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. ↩︎

    35. Barrett, Lisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. ↩︎

    36. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. The Embodied Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1999. ↩︎

    37. Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1959. ↩︎

    38. Varela, Francisco J. The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. ↩︎

    39. Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. ↩︎

    40. Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. ↩︎

    41. Ramachandran, V.S. The Tell-Tale Brain. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011. ↩︎

    42. Lieberman, Matthew D. Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York: Crown, 2013. ↩︎

    43. Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974. ↩︎

    44. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    45. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    46. van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. ↩︎

    47. Minsky, Marvin. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986. ↩︎

    48. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    49. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    50. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963. ↩︎

    51. Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990. ↩︎

    52. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963. ↩︎

    53. Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gödel, Escher, Bach. New York: Basic Books, 1979. ↩︎

    54. Churchland, Paul M. Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984. ↩︎

    55. Fodor, Jerry A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983. ↩︎

    56. Edelman, Gerald M. Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books, 1987. ↩︎

    57. van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. ↩︎

    58. Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. ↩︎

    59. Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934. ↩︎

    60. Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934. ↩︎

    61. Clark, Andy. Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ↩︎

    62. Clark, Andy. Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ↩︎

    63. Edelman, Gerald M. Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books, 1987. ↩︎

    64. Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990. ↩︎

    65. Asch, Solomon E. “Studies of Independence and Conformity.” Psychological Monographs 70, no. 9 (1956): 1-70. ↩︎

    66. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. ↩︎

    67. Asch, Solomon E. “Studies of Independence and Conformity.” Psychological Monographs 70, no. 9 (1956): 1-70. ↩︎

    68. Langer, Ellen J. Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989. ↩︎

    69. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎

    70. Jung, Carl Gustav. Man and His Symbols. Garden City: Doubleday, 1964. ↩︎